AIACT.si is open to strategic acquisition. Contact us about the domain →
Global AI Governance · Updated September 2026

Global
AI Acts.

There is no single global AI law. Europe has a horizontal AI Act. The United States uses a distributed federal, state and sectoral approach. China relies on layered binding measures. Other jurisdictions are building their own models.

European Union

EU AI Act

Risk-based horizontal regulation with prohibited practices, GPAI obligations, transparency rules and high-risk requirements. Important application dates are phased, with enforcement powers applying from 2 August 2026.

United States

Distributed AI governance

No single federal horizontal AI Act currently mirrors the EU model. Federal executive policy, agencies, sectoral law and state legislation form a distributed framework.

China

Layered binding measures

China regulates recommendation algorithms, deep synthesis, generative AI services and AI-generated synthetic content. AI content identification measures took effect on 1 September 2025.

United Kingdom

Sector-led framework

The UK primarily uses existing regulators and sectoral rules. The Artificial Superintelligence Bill is a parliamentary proposal, not current law.

Japan

Promotion + governance

Japan’s approach emphasizes development, utilization, national strategy and risk governance with a comparatively innovation-oriented model.

South Korea

AI Basic Act

The current amended Framework Act on AI Development and Trust is effective 21 July 2026 and includes provisions for high-impact AI, safety, trust and oversight.

Verification layer

Official
sources.

European Commission · AI ActOpen source ↗
European Commission · AI Act enforcementOpen source ↗
United States · White House AIOpen source ↗
China · Cyberspace AdministrationOpen source ↗
United Kingdom · Parliament BillsOpen source ↗
Japan · Cabinet Office AIOpen source ↗
South Korea · Official law databaseOpen source ↗