EU AI Act
Risk-based horizontal regulation with prohibited practices, GPAI obligations, transparency rules and high-risk requirements. Important application dates are phased, with enforcement powers applying from 2 August 2026.
There is no single global AI law. Europe has a horizontal AI Act. The United States uses a distributed federal, state and sectoral approach. China relies on layered binding measures. Other jurisdictions are building their own models.
Risk-based horizontal regulation with prohibited practices, GPAI obligations, transparency rules and high-risk requirements. Important application dates are phased, with enforcement powers applying from 2 August 2026.
No single federal horizontal AI Act currently mirrors the EU model. Federal executive policy, agencies, sectoral law and state legislation form a distributed framework.
China regulates recommendation algorithms, deep synthesis, generative AI services and AI-generated synthetic content. AI content identification measures took effect on 1 September 2025.
The UK primarily uses existing regulators and sectoral rules. The Artificial Superintelligence Bill is a parliamentary proposal, not current law.
Japan’s approach emphasizes development, utilization, national strategy and risk governance with a comparatively innovation-oriented model.
The current amended Framework Act on AI Development and Trust is effective 21 July 2026 and includes provisions for high-impact AI, safety, trust and oversight.
This page is an informational overview and not legal advice. AI regulation changes quickly; always consult the latest official text and competent legal counsel for compliance decisions.